<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2271 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472502</link>
    <description>Section 54 deduction applied to capital gains from transfer of a long-term asset comprising a residential house or land appurtenant to it. A structure constructed shortly before the transfer did not preclude relief where its existence was on record and its residential character had not been specifically rejected. Treatment of the asset as an open plot was therefore insufficient to deny the deduction, and the disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 13:28:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2271 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472502</link>
      <description>Section 54 deduction applied to capital gains from transfer of a long-term asset comprising a residential house or land appurtenant to it. A structure constructed shortly before the transfer did not preclude relief where its existence was on record and its residential character had not been specifically rejected. Treatment of the asset as an open plot was therefore insufficient to deny the deduction, and the disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>