<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 216 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54503</link>
    <description>Duty demand for periods before and after 1-3-1986 was examined against earlier appellate findings and admissible input credit. The demand up to 28-2-1986 had already been set aside and could not survive in the de novo proceedings. For the post-1-3-1986 period, inputs outside Chapter Heading 72.03 supported the assessee&#039;s claim, while inputs under Heading 72.03 attracted Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs and deemed credit where applicable, which neutralised the demand. Confirmation of duty without accounting for admissible credit was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:30:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 216 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54503</link>
      <description>Duty demand for periods before and after 1-3-1986 was examined against earlier appellate findings and admissible input credit. The demand up to 28-2-1986 had already been set aside and could not survive in the de novo proceedings. For the post-1-3-1986 period, inputs outside Chapter Heading 72.03 supported the assessee&#039;s claim, while inputs under Heading 72.03 attracted Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs and deemed credit where applicable, which neutralised the demand. Confirmation of duty without accounting for admissible credit was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>