<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Mandatory detention deadlines invalidate late GST penalty proceedings despite later confiscation action and protect hearing and appeal rights.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104970</link>
    <description>Section 129(3) of the CGST Act imposes a mandatory two-stage deadline: a penalty notice must issue within seven days of detention or seizure, followed by a penalty order within seven days of service. Breach of either period, including a one-day delay, invalidates the detention adjudication; later confiscation action cannot retrospectively cure it, although independently authorised proceedings may remain available. Service, including portal availability under Section 169, determines the second period, while Rule 142 requires corresponding electronic summaries. A hearing is required before penalty determination. Payment to obtain release, particularly under protest after objections, does not itself waive a challenge; a reasoned order remains necessary to preserve appellate access.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:45:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:45:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Mandatory detention deadlines invalidate late GST penalty proceedings despite later confiscation action and protect hearing and appeal rights.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104970</link>
      <description>Section 129(3) of the CGST Act imposes a mandatory two-stage deadline: a penalty notice must issue within seven days of detention or seizure, followed by a penalty order within seven days of service. Breach of either period, including a one-day delay, invalidates the detention adjudication; later confiscation action cannot retrospectively cure it, although independently authorised proceedings may remain available. Service, including portal availability under Section 169, determines the second period, while Rule 142 requires corresponding electronic summaries. A hearing is required before penalty determination. Payment to obtain release, particularly under protest after objections, does not itself waive a challenge; a reasoned order remains necessary to preserve appellate access.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:45:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>