<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 868 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800925</link>
    <description>Refund limitation for duty paid on stolen goods runs from the judicial release order returning the recovered goods, rather than from the date of duty payment. Where stolen goods could not be used in manufacture and were subsequently recovered, the release order created the cause of action for seeking a refund. A claim filed within one year from that order falls within the statutory limitation period and is allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:17:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 868 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800925</link>
      <description>Refund limitation for duty paid on stolen goods runs from the judicial release order returning the recovered goods, rather than from the date of duty payment. Where stolen goods could not be used in manufacture and were subsequently recovered, the release order created the cause of action for seeking a refund. A claim filed within one year from that order falls within the statutory limitation period and is allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>