https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800932 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2) may arise where material elements of the cause of action, including property attachment, bank-account attachment, residence, or custody, have a sufficient territorial nexus with the court. Under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, where cognizance of the scheduled offence and money-laundering complaint is taken by different courts, the statutory committal mechanism enables the scheduled-offence matter to be placed before the Special Court. The resulting proceedings remain separate trials. The authorised authority's discretion to invoke committal must conform to the statutory scheme and cannot be exercised arbitrarily, particularly without a cogent change in facts or law after earlier recognising the connection between proceedings. en-us Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:17:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800932 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2) may arise where material elements of the cause of action, including property attachment, bank-account attachment, residence, or custody, have a sufficient territorial nexus with the court. Under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, where cognizance of the scheduled offence and money-laundering complaint is taken by different courts, the statutory committal mechanism enables the scheduled-offence matter to be placed before the Special Court. The resulting proceedings remain separate trials. The authorised authority's discretion to invoke committal must conform to the statutory scheme and cannot be exercised arbitrarily, particularly without a cogent change in facts or law after earlier recognising the connection between proceedings. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800932