<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 891 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800948</link>
    <description>Enhanced taxation under Section 115BBE applied only to transactions undertaken from 1 April 2017, not to transactions in the preceding financial year relevant to assessment year 2017-18. The amendment increasing the rate from 30% to 60% was treated as prospective. In the absence of jurisdictional High Court guidance and given conflicting non-jurisdictional views, the beneficial interpretation of the taxing provision applied, requiring tax computation at the pre-amendment rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:17:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 891 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800948</link>
      <description>Enhanced taxation under Section 115BBE applied only to transactions undertaken from 1 April 2017, not to transactions in the preceding financial year relevant to assessment year 2017-18. The amendment increasing the rate from 30% to 60% was treated as prospective. In the absence of jurisdictional High Court guidance and given conflicting non-jurisdictional views, the beneficial interpretation of the taxing provision applied, requiring tax computation at the pre-amendment rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>