<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Functional comparability requires data-driven analysis; outsourcing justified exclusion where no perversity undermined the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104939</link>
    <description>Functional comparability in transfer pricing is a factual, data-driven assessment that must conform to Rule 10B. The High Court upheld the exclusion of an outsourced-service provider from the comparable set because outsourcing a major portion of its work made it functionally dissimilar to the assessee. The Revenue produced no contrary material and failed to establish perversity, reliance on irrelevant material, or exclusion of relevant material in the Tribunal&#039;s factual finding. The substantial questions of law were answered for the assessee, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:17:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:17:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Functional comparability requires data-driven analysis; outsourcing justified exclusion where no perversity undermined the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104939</link>
      <description>Functional comparability in transfer pricing is a factual, data-driven assessment that must conform to Rule 10B. The High Court upheld the exclusion of an outsourced-service provider from the comparable set because outsourcing a major portion of its work made it functionally dissimilar to the assessee. The Revenue produced no contrary material and failed to establish perversity, reliance on irrelevant material, or exclusion of relevant material in the Tribunal&#039;s factual finding. The substantial questions of law were answered for the assessee, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:17:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>