<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 371 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54487</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner&#039;s enhanced valuation, directing assessment based on the importer&#039;s declared transaction value. Confiscation of goods was upheld due to import without a license, consistent with the DGFT&#039;s Policy Circular. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 3,00,000/-, and the penalty was decreased to Rs. 75,000/-. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 18:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 371 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54487</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner&#039;s enhanced valuation, directing assessment based on the importer&#039;s declared transaction value. Confiscation of goods was upheld due to import without a license, consistent with the DGFT&#039;s Policy Circular. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 3,00,000/-, and the penalty was decreased to Rs. 75,000/-. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>