<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2267 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472484</link>
    <description>Cash deposits in a bank account omitted from financial statements may be assessed as unexplained investment where the taxpayer fails to establish a credible source. Source evidence that does not withstand verification, including agreements containing dates inconsistent with the claimed transaction period, does not satisfactorily explain the deposits. Section 69 therefore applies to deposits for which no reliable explanation is proved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:16:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2267 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472484</link>
      <description>Cash deposits in a bank account omitted from financial statements may be assessed as unexplained investment where the taxpayer fails to establish a credible source. Source evidence that does not withstand verification, including agreements containing dates inconsistent with the claimed transaction period, does not satisfactorily explain the deposits. Section 69 therefore applies to deposits for which no reliable explanation is proved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>