<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1980 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472466</link>
    <description>Mandatory pre-show cause notice consultation was in issue in service-tax proceedings. The impugned adjudication order did not refer to any pre-consultation notice or consultation. Respondents were directed to file an affidavit, with relevant file notings, addressing whether consultation occurred. Further action or proceedings against the petitioner were restrained on an ad-interim basis pending further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1980 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472466</link>
      <description>Mandatory pre-show cause notice consultation was in issue in service-tax proceedings. The impugned adjudication order did not refer to any pre-consultation notice or consultation. Respondents were directed to file an affidavit, with relevant file notings, addressing whether consultation occurred. Further action or proceedings against the petitioner were restrained on an ad-interim basis pending further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>