<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1546 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472465</link>
    <description>Partition decrees bind parties and persons claiming through them, but cannot conclusively determine or defeat independent third-party title in execution. Under Order XXI Rules 97-101 CPC, an executing court may assess whether obstructionists show a prima facie bona fide independent claim, rather than finally adjudicating their title. Fraud cannot invalidate a preliminary decree without specific pleadings and evidence as required by Order VI Rule 4 CPC. Pattas, supporting revenue material, and presumptions applicable to ancient documents may support resistance to execution. Questions under inam, jagir abolition, land-reform and urban-land-ceiling regimes, including State claims, remain for appropriate proceedings where the State was not a party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 14:45:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1546 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472465</link>
      <description>Partition decrees bind parties and persons claiming through them, but cannot conclusively determine or defeat independent third-party title in execution. Under Order XXI Rules 97-101 CPC, an executing court may assess whether obstructionists show a prima facie bona fide independent claim, rather than finally adjudicating their title. Fraud cannot invalidate a preliminary decree without specific pleadings and evidence as required by Order VI Rule 4 CPC. Pattas, supporting revenue material, and presumptions applicable to ancient documents may support resistance to execution. Questions under inam, jagir abolition, land-reform and urban-land-ceiling regimes, including State claims, remain for appropriate proceedings where the State was not a party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>