<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cash seizure under CGST search powers requires clear statutory authority, objective reasons, and evidentiary relevance despite appellate remedies.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104915</link>
    <description>Section 67(2) of the CGST Act is described as not authorising seizure of cash merely because it is suspected to represent unaccounted sale proceeds. Cash is excluded from &quot;goods&quot; and, under an ejusdem generis construction, &quot;things&quot; is confined to material with evidentiary relevance alongside documents and books. Seizure requires objectively supported reasons to believe satisfying statutory conditions; a later adjudicatory finding cannot cure absent authority at the time of seizure. A jurisdictional challenge to such seizure may proceed despite an alternative appellate remedy. Release remains subject to any independently lawful restraint or attachment, with applicable interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 13:41:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 13:41:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cash seizure under CGST search powers requires clear statutory authority, objective reasons, and evidentiary relevance despite appellate remedies.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104915</link>
      <description>Section 67(2) of the CGST Act is described as not authorising seizure of cash merely because it is suspected to represent unaccounted sale proceeds. Cash is excluded from &quot;goods&quot; and, under an ejusdem generis construction, &quot;things&quot; is confined to material with evidentiary relevance alongside documents and books. Seizure requires objectively supported reasons to believe satisfying statutory conditions; a later adjudicatory finding cannot cure absent authority at the time of seizure. A jurisdictional challenge to such seizure may proceed despite an alternative appellate remedy. Release remains subject to any independently lawful restraint or attachment, with applicable interest.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 13:41:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>