<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated enterprises.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104896</link>
    <description>Arm&#039;s-length benchmarking of business-support and general-management services rendered to an associated enterprise must focus on the specific controlled transaction and the functions performed, assets employed and risks assumed. TNMM does not remove the requirement for functional comparability; hospital or healthcare entities cannot be selected merely because the taxpayer operates fertility clinics without demonstrating similarity to the services benchmarked. Inadequate examination or production of the agreement, invoices and contemporaneous evidence concerning actual service rendition required fresh determination. The transfer-pricing adjustment was set aside and remitted for arm&#039;s-length price determination after FAR analysis and selection of functionally comparable entities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 10:08:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 10:08:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated enterprises.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104896</link>
      <description>Arm&#039;s-length benchmarking of business-support and general-management services rendered to an associated enterprise must focus on the specific controlled transaction and the functions performed, assets employed and risks assumed. TNMM does not remove the requirement for functional comparability; hospital or healthcare entities cannot be selected merely because the taxpayer operates fertility clinics without demonstrating similarity to the services benchmarked. Inadequate examination or production of the agreement, invoices and contemporaneous evidence concerning actual service rendition required fresh determination. The transfer-pricing adjustment was set aside and remitted for arm&#039;s-length price determination after FAR analysis and selection of functionally comparable entities.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 10:08:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>