https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800862 Recall of a concluded intervention order requires proven fraud involving an intention to deceive and a material effect on the decision; an attested affidavit, where its contents are undisputed, does not meet that standard merely because it lacks a separate record of swearing. Curable affidavit irregularities do not vitiate adjudication, and recall cannot substitute for review on the merits. In disciplinary proceedings concerning a resolution professional, persons with only indirect interests arising from a separate liquidation lack the direct legal interest needed for impleadment or intervention. Limited participation under Order I Rule 8A is confined to public-interest legal submissions and cannot enable representative contest or entry solely through an interim stay application. en-us Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Oct 2026 07:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800862 Recall of a concluded intervention order requires proven fraud involving an intention to deceive and a material effect on the decision; an attested affidavit, where its contents are undisputed, does not meet that standard merely because it lacks a separate record of swearing. Curable affidavit irregularities do not vitiate adjudication, and recall cannot substitute for review on the merits. In disciplinary proceedings concerning a resolution professional, persons with only indirect interests arising from a separate liquidation lack the direct legal interest needed for impleadment or intervention. Limited participation under Order I Rule 8A is confined to public-interest legal submissions and cannot enable representative contest or entry solely through an interim stay application. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800862