<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 202 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54470</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as time-barred by the Tribunal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision due to the appeal being filed beyond the stipulated 90-day period after serving the Order-in-Original. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of adhering to the 60-day time limit for filing appeals under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, with a provision for a 30-day extension upon showing sufficient cause. Despite the Appellants&#039; arguments regarding delayed receipt of the order, the Tribunal deemed the appeal untimely and rejected it, underscoring the significance of timely filing to avoid dismissal on procedural grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:45:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 202 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54470</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as time-barred by the Tribunal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision due to the appeal being filed beyond the stipulated 90-day period after serving the Order-in-Original. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of adhering to the 60-day time limit for filing appeals under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, with a provision for a 30-day extension upon showing sufficient cause. Despite the Appellants&#039; arguments regarding delayed receipt of the order, the Tribunal deemed the appeal untimely and rejected it, underscoring the significance of timely filing to avoid dismissal on procedural grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>