<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2244 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472430</link>
    <description>Head-office directors&#039; remuneration and fees allocated to an Indian permanent establishment qualify as executive and general administrative expenditure under Section 44C where a certified turnover-based allocation remains within the statutory ceiling. Article 7 of the India-Singapore tax treaty permits deduction of permanent-establishment expenses incurred in India or elsewhere, subject to domestic-law limits. Section 44C operates independently of inconsistent provisions in Sections 28 to 43A through its non obstante clause. A common head-office expense allocation cannot be rejected merely because it is notional when it is properly certified and within the statutory limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:47:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2244 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472430</link>
      <description>Head-office directors&#039; remuneration and fees allocated to an Indian permanent establishment qualify as executive and general administrative expenditure under Section 44C where a certified turnover-based allocation remains within the statutory ceiling. Article 7 of the India-Singapore tax treaty permits deduction of permanent-establishment expenses incurred in India or elsewhere, subject to domestic-law limits. Section 44C operates independently of inconsistent provisions in Sections 28 to 43A through its non obstante clause. A common head-office expense allocation cannot be rejected merely because it is notional when it is properly certified and within the statutory limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>