<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2249 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472435</link>
    <description>Section 68 permits addition of an unsecured loan only where the credit remains unexplained. Information alleging that a lender provides accommodation entries, without verification of contrary banking evidence, does not by itself establish an unexplained cash credit. Where repayment through RTGS is supported by the lender&#039;s bank statement and remains neither verified nor disputed by the Revenue, the loan is not liable to addition under Section 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:47:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2249 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472435</link>
      <description>Section 68 permits addition of an unsecured loan only where the credit remains unexplained. Information alleging that a lender provides accommodation entries, without verification of contrary banking evidence, does not by itself establish an unexplained cash credit. Where repayment through RTGS is supported by the lender&#039;s bank statement and remains neither verified nor disputed by the Revenue, the loan is not liable to addition under Section 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>