<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1619 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472423</link>
    <description>Section 68 cash-credit addition for an unsecured loan was unsustainable because creditor confirmation, ledger accounts, tax records, financial statements and bank statements established the creditor&#039;s identity, creditworthiness and prima facie genuineness. Recorded interest payments and subsequent repayment supported the transaction, while the creditor&#039;s funds showed no cash deposits immediately before the advance. A retracted general allegation concerning accommodation entries, without material linking the borrower to a cash-for-cheque arrangement, could not displace the documentary evidence. In the absence of effective enquiry or rebuttal, the unexplained cash-credit addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:58:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1619 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472423</link>
      <description>Section 68 cash-credit addition for an unsecured loan was unsustainable because creditor confirmation, ledger accounts, tax records, financial statements and bank statements established the creditor&#039;s identity, creditworthiness and prima facie genuineness. Recorded interest payments and subsequent repayment supported the transaction, while the creditor&#039;s funds showed no cash deposits immediately before the advance. A retracted general allegation concerning accommodation entries, without material linking the borrower to a cash-for-cheque arrangement, could not displace the documentary evidence. In the absence of effective enquiry or rebuttal, the unexplained cash-credit addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>