<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 367 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54456</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the additional fittings provided by the appellants for the flushing cistern were accessories and not integral parts. The value of these fittings should not be included in the assessable value of the cistern, based on the distinction made from previous rulings where certain items were considered integral to the main product.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:08:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 367 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54456</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the additional fittings provided by the appellants for the flushing cistern were accessories and not integral parts. The value of these fittings should not be included in the assessable value of the cistern, based on the distinction made from previous rulings where certain items were considered integral to the main product.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>