<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 725 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800782</link>
    <description>Under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, a bank-account freezing order need not itself disclose the recorded reasons to believe if those reasons and supporting materials are forwarded to the Adjudicating Authority in the prescribed sealed manner. Procedural compliance also requires a timely application to continue the freezing order and statutory notice. Whether frozen property represents proceeds of crime, including whether restraint should be limited to identifiable proceeds, is to be determined through adjudication after notice and hearing. Writ intervention is ordinarily unavailable while the statutory adjudication process and appellate remedies remain effective.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 04:18:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 725 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800782</link>
      <description>Under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, a bank-account freezing order need not itself disclose the recorded reasons to believe if those reasons and supporting materials are forwarded to the Adjudicating Authority in the prescribed sealed manner. Procedural compliance also requires a timely application to continue the freezing order and statutory notice. Whether frozen property represents proceeds of crime, including whether restraint should be limited to identifiable proceeds, is to be determined through adjudication after notice and hearing. Writ intervention is ordinarily unavailable while the statutory adjudication process and appellate remedies remain effective.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>