<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 730 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800787</link>
    <description>Under the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, prior Reserve Bank sanction concerning an insured co-operative bank does not replace the Registrar&#039;s duty to satisfy the statutory conditions for winding up. A Section 99 winding-up process requires a valid Section 92 inspection, communication of the inspection report or summary to affected stakeholders, an independent recorded opinion, and a meaningful opportunity to be heard where grave civil consequences arise. A member may appeal a winding-up order under Entry 13 of the Third Schedule despite liquidation; requiring recourse through a liquidator whose appointment is contested would undermine that right and conflict with the rule against self-judging.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 04:18:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 730 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800787</link>
      <description>Under the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, prior Reserve Bank sanction concerning an insured co-operative bank does not replace the Registrar&#039;s duty to satisfy the statutory conditions for winding up. A Section 99 winding-up process requires a valid Section 92 inspection, communication of the inspection report or summary to affected stakeholders, an independent recorded opinion, and a meaningful opportunity to be heard where grave civil consequences arise. A member may appeal a winding-up order under Entry 13 of the Third Schedule despite liquidation; requiring recourse through a liquidator whose appointment is contested would undermine that right and conflict with the rule against self-judging.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>