<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 734 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800791</link>
    <description>Release of cargo containers was not directed because the containers still held cargo requiring de-stuffing upon payment of charges. Neither private party agreed to pay those charges, and the importer, whose tribunal appeal remained pending, had not been impleaded. The writ appeal was closed, with liberty to seek appropriate orders from the authorities after notice to the importer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 04:18:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 734 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800791</link>
      <description>Release of cargo containers was not directed because the containers still held cargo requiring de-stuffing upon payment of charges. Neither private party agreed to pay those charges, and the importer, whose tribunal appeal remained pending, had not been impleaded. The writ appeal was closed, with liberty to seek appropriate orders from the authorities after notice to the importer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>