<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 199 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54450</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was denied on welding electrodes, H.P. plates, angles and M.S. plates because the items were used for repair and maintenance of machinery, not as capital goods. On that factual basis, they were held outside the ambit of capital goods, and credit was held inadmissible. The earlier authorities cited by the assessee were found inapplicable to those facts, so the denial of credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:55:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 199 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54450</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was denied on welding electrodes, H.P. plates, angles and M.S. plates because the items were used for repair and maintenance of machinery, not as capital goods. On that factual basis, they were held outside the ambit of capital goods, and credit was held inadmissible. The earlier authorities cited by the assessee were found inapplicable to those facts, so the denial of credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>