https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800813 Standing to challenge a search and seizure authorisation directed at a company belongs to the affected company. An additional director does not obtain a personal cause of action merely by holding that office and therefore cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to contest the authorisation. Any grievance concerning the legality of the search or its authorisation must be pursued by the company. en-us Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Oct 2026 04:18:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800813 Standing to challenge a search and seizure authorisation directed at a company belongs to the affected company. An additional director does not obtain a personal cause of action merely by holding that office and therefore cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to contest the authorisation. Any grievance concerning the legality of the search or its authorisation must be pursued by the company. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800813