<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 760 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800817</link>
    <description>Reassessment under Sections 148 and 148A requires a valid basis to conclude that income has escaped assessment. Disclosure of cryptocurrency sales, purchases, opening and closing stock, and resulting income in the return, reply and reconciliation statement precludes a finding of non-disclosure merely because the return form lacks a separate cryptocurrency reporting head. Because the premise of undisclosed Bitcoin transactions was factually incorrect, the Section 148 notice and Section 148A(d) order were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 04:18:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 760 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800817</link>
      <description>Reassessment under Sections 148 and 148A requires a valid basis to conclude that income has escaped assessment. Disclosure of cryptocurrency sales, purchases, opening and closing stock, and resulting income in the return, reply and reconciliation statement precludes a finding of non-disclosure merely because the return form lacks a separate cryptocurrency reporting head. Because the premise of undisclosed Bitcoin transactions was factually incorrect, the Section 148 notice and Section 148A(d) order were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>