<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 772 - GSTAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800829</link>
    <description>Input tax credit on invoices absent from GSTR-2A was denied where the recipient admitted that suppliers had not uploaded the invoices and failed to establish that suppliers paid the tax, as required under the pre-amendment matching and reversal scheme. Interest on sustained ineligible credit remained recoverable as mandatory and incidental to reversal, even though not expressly proposed in the show-cause notice; however, it must be recomputed invoice-wise from availment until reversal or payment under the statutory mechanism. Separate interest based solely on credit exceeding the Rule 36(4) provisional-credit limit was deleted because it was not contemplated by the show-cause notice and fell outside the original proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 04:18:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 772 - GSTAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800829</link>
      <description>Input tax credit on invoices absent from GSTR-2A was denied where the recipient admitted that suppliers had not uploaded the invoices and failed to establish that suppliers paid the tax, as required under the pre-amendment matching and reversal scheme. Interest on sustained ineligible credit remained recoverable as mandatory and incidental to reversal, even though not expressly proposed in the show-cause notice; however, it must be recomputed invoice-wise from availment until reversal or payment under the statutory mechanism. Separate interest based solely on credit exceeding the Rule 36(4) provisional-credit limit was deleted because it was not contemplated by the show-cause notice and fell outside the original proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>