<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 198 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54446</link>
    <description>Section 35E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 does not restrict review-based authorisation for filing an appeal to the adjudicating authority or to an officer of equal or higher rank. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner may authorise any officer to file the appeal against the adjudicating authority&#039;s order, so an objection that an Assistant Commissioner lacked competence was ? Need English only. The objection was rejected, the Revenue&#039;s challenge on that procedural issue succeeded, and the matter was remanded for decision on merits after hearing both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:47:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 198 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54446</link>
      <description>Section 35E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 does not restrict review-based authorisation for filing an appeal to the adjudicating authority or to an officer of equal or higher rank. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner may authorise any officer to file the appeal against the adjudicating authority&#039;s order, so an objection that an Assistant Commissioner lacked competence was ? Need English only. The objection was rejected, the Revenue&#039;s challenge on that procedural issue succeeded, and the matter was remanded for decision on merits after hearing both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>