<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 783 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800840</link>
    <description>Section 73 adjudication requires observance of natural justice through adequate notice and a meaningful opportunity to respond. Uploading a show-cause notice and adjudication order only under the GST portal&#039;s &quot;Additional Notice and Orders&quot; tab, without separate intimation, breaches those requirements where the taxpayer cannot submit a reply. The ex parte adjudication was quashed, with fresh reasoned adjudication directed after allowing a reply and affording a hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 04:18:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 783 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800840</link>
      <description>Section 73 adjudication requires observance of natural justice through adequate notice and a meaningful opportunity to respond. Uploading a show-cause notice and adjudication order only under the GST portal&#039;s &quot;Additional Notice and Orders&quot; tab, without separate intimation, breaches those requirements where the taxpayer cannot submit a reply. The ex parte adjudication was quashed, with fresh reasoned adjudication directed after allowing a reply and affording a hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>