<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 792 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800849</link>
    <description>Rule 96(10)&#039;s omission without a saving clause raises issues concerning the continuing legal effect of the omitted provision, its constitutional validity, and recovery of tax refunds under tax law. The Supreme Court found no good ground to interfere with the High Court&#039;s common orders on those issues, leaving those orders undisturbed in their operative effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 04:18:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 792 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800849</link>
      <description>Rule 96(10)&#039;s omission without a saving clause raises issues concerning the continuing legal effect of the omitted provision, its constitutional validity, and recovery of tax refunds under tax law. The Supreme Court found no good ground to interfere with the High Court&#039;s common orders on those issues, leaving those orders undisturbed in their operative effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>