<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 197 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54444</link>
    <description>For embroidery machines assessed under the special procedure, metre length is to be computed with reference to one roller only, even where the machine has two rollers. The stated rationale is that a two-roller embroidery machine remains a single machine for duty purposes, and the later amendment was treated as clarificatory and consistent with the earlier trade notice and departmental understanding. On that basis, a duty demand calculated by adding both rollers was unsustainable, and the related penalties, confiscation, redemption fine, and interest also failed as they were consequential to the incorrect computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:43:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 197 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54444</link>
      <description>For embroidery machines assessed under the special procedure, metre length is to be computed with reference to one roller only, even where the machine has two rollers. The stated rationale is that a two-roller embroidery machine remains a single machine for duty purposes, and the later amendment was treated as clarificatory and consistent with the earlier trade notice and departmental understanding. On that basis, a duty demand calculated by adding both rollers was unsustainable, and the related penalties, confiscation, redemption fine, and interest also failed as they were consequential to the incorrect computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>