<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1858 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472408</link>
    <description>For CGST Act assessments concerning input tax credit, the electronic credit ledger is treated as a pooled wallet containing IGST, CGST and SGST credit rather than separate tax-head compartments. Cross-head utilisation of IGST credit towards CGST and SGST liabilities cannot be treated as wrongful availment without applying that pooled-wallet principle. Findings that treated such utilisation as wrongful were set aside and require fresh determination under the correct ledger treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 14:49:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1858 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472408</link>
      <description>For CGST Act assessments concerning input tax credit, the electronic credit ledger is treated as a pooled wallet containing IGST, CGST and SGST credit rather than separate tax-head compartments. Cross-head utilisation of IGST credit towards CGST and SGST liabilities cannot be treated as wrongful availment without applying that pooled-wallet principle. Findings that treated such utilisation as wrongful were set aside and require fresh determination under the correct ledger treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>