<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1488 - KERALA HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472410</link>
    <description>Input tax credit utilisation across CGST, SGST and IGST must be assessed under the governing rules and the binding Division Bench position on cross-utilisation. Rejection solely because credit was adjusted against CGST and SGST rather than IGST is unsustainable. The assessment requires fresh determination in accordance with that binding position after the assessee is heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 14:49:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1488 - KERALA HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472410</link>
      <description>Input tax credit utilisation across CGST, SGST and IGST must be assessed under the governing rules and the binding Division Bench position on cross-utilisation. Rejection solely because credit was adjusted against CGST and SGST rather than IGST is unsustainable. The assessment requires fresh determination in accordance with that binding position after the assessee is heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>