<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1334 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472401</link>
    <description>Validity of the assessment framed under sections 153A and 143(3) was determinative. A related appeal had already quashed that assessment because of foundational legal infirmities concerning the statutory approval required under section 153D. Since the underlying assessment no longer survived, the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the reduction of an addition for cash deposits made during demonetisation was dismissed in limine, without examining the merits of the disputed addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1334 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472401</link>
      <description>Validity of the assessment framed under sections 153A and 143(3) was determinative. A related appeal had already quashed that assessment because of foundational legal infirmities concerning the statutory approval required under section 153D. Since the underlying assessment no longer survived, the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the reduction of an addition for cash deposits made during demonetisation was dismissed in limine, without examining the merits of the disputed addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>