<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GST seizure retention limits require return of phones and debit cards when no valid extension order exists.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104813</link>
    <description>Section 67 of the CGST Act limits retention of seized articles through necessity-based and time-bound safeguards. Documents, books and things may be retained only while necessary for examination, inquiry or proceedings, and material not relied upon for a notice must be returned within the statutory period. The High Court applied the six-month return rule to seized mobile phones and bank debit cards and required their return because no extension order existed. Continued investigation alone cannot replace an extension based on sufficient cause by the proper officer, for no more than a further six months. Written authorisation, seizure orders and inventories remain central to assessing whether retention is lawful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 12:00:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 12:00:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GST seizure retention limits require return of phones and debit cards when no valid extension order exists.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104813</link>
      <description>Section 67 of the CGST Act limits retention of seized articles through necessity-based and time-bound safeguards. Documents, books and things may be retained only while necessary for examination, inquiry or proceedings, and material not relied upon for a notice must be returned within the statutory period. The High Court applied the six-month return rule to seized mobile phones and bank debit cards and required their return because no extension order existed. Continued investigation alone cannot replace an extension based on sufficient cause by the proper officer, for no more than a further six months. Written authorisation, seizure orders and inventories remain central to assessing whether retention is lawful.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 12:00:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>