<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 638 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800695</link>
    <description>Transportation of goods by road does not create further service-tax liability for the provider where the recipient has discharged the tax under the reverse charge mechanism. The absence of a consignment note, together with tax payment by the recipient, supports the conclusion that no additional tax is payable by the transport service provider. Consequently, a service-tax demand and associated penalty against the provider are unsustainable in these circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 08:32:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 638 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800695</link>
      <description>Transportation of goods by road does not create further service-tax liability for the provider where the recipient has discharged the tax under the reverse charge mechanism. The absence of a consignment note, together with tax payment by the recipient, supports the conclusion that no additional tax is payable by the transport service provider. Consequently, a service-tax demand and associated penalty against the provider are unsustainable in these circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>