https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54430 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a dispute over the clearance of newsprint. The Commissioner contended that duty should be levied on a differential quantity due to weight variance, alleging duty evasion. However, the Tribunal found that unless it was proven that the differential quantity was supplied to entities other than newspaper publishers, duty imposition could not be upheld. As the newsprint was confirmed to have been supplied solely to newspaper publishers, the appeals were allowed, and the Commissioner's order was overturned. en-us Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:16:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54430 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a dispute over the clearance of newsprint. The Commissioner contended that duty should be levied on a differential quantity due to weight variance, alleging duty evasion. However, the Tribunal found that unless it was proven that the differential quantity was supplied to entities other than newspaper publishers, duty imposition could not be upheld. As the newsprint was confirmed to have been supplied solely to newspaper publishers, the appeals were allowed, and the Commissioner's order was overturned. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54430