<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 300 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54428</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi set aside the Commissioner of Central Excise, Ludhiana&#039;s decision disallowing abatement claims for certain periods. The Tribunal found merit in the appellants&#039; argument that the furnaces operated as separate units with distinct records and electricity connections. It deemed the disallowance of abatement claims during furnace closures as incorrect and allowed them for the relevant periods. The Tribunal directed a reexamination of a specific period&#039;s abatement claim and upheld a duty liability amount while setting aside penalties imposed on the appellants. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:13:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 300 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54428</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi set aside the Commissioner of Central Excise, Ludhiana&#039;s decision disallowing abatement claims for certain periods. The Tribunal found merit in the appellants&#039; argument that the furnaces operated as separate units with distinct records and electricity connections. It deemed the disallowance of abatement claims during furnace closures as incorrect and allowed them for the relevant periods. The Tribunal directed a reexamination of a specific period&#039;s abatement claim and upheld a duty liability amount while setting aside penalties imposed on the appellants. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>