https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800735 Revisionary jurisdiction requires an assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue. Relevant inquiries and documentary evidence concerning continuing business expenditure after transfer of stock, property-related indexed improvement costs and capital loss, and fixed-asset reclassifications support a permissible assessment view. Expenditure connected with retained liabilities and continuing income activities cannot be split solely by the transfer date; revenue neutrality also negates prejudice. Internal branch transfers of existing assets at book cost do not constitute fresh acquisitions. Revision cannot rest merely on a preference for another view after adequate inquiry. en-us Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Oct 2026 08:32:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800735 Revisionary jurisdiction requires an assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue. Relevant inquiries and documentary evidence concerning continuing business expenditure after transfer of stock, property-related indexed improvement costs and capital loss, and fixed-asset reclassifications support a permissible assessment view. Expenditure connected with retained liabilities and continuing income activities cannot be split solely by the transfer date; revenue neutrality also negates prejudice. Internal branch transfers of existing assets at book cost do not constitute fresh acquisitions. Revision cannot rest merely on a preference for another view after adequate inquiry. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800735