<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 191 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54422</link>
    <description>Where Cenvat credit on thermo couple tips was initially taken as inputs and later treated as capital goods, the assessee had sufficient balance in the Cenvat account and the classification was changed only during adjudication; on those facts, the taking of credit did not justify penal action and penalty was held not imposable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:05:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 191 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54422</link>
      <description>Where Cenvat credit on thermo couple tips was initially taken as inputs and later treated as capital goods, the assessee had sufficient balance in the Cenvat account and the classification was changed only during adjudication; on those facts, the taking of credit did not justify penal action and penalty was held not imposable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>