<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2234 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472383</link>
    <description>Commission income from alleged accommodation entries was estimated at 0.15% of the entry amounts. Consistent estimates at that rate in the taxpayer&#039;s immediately succeeding assessment years were applied under the principle of judicial discipline, rather than the proposed 1% rate. The income was therefore assessed using the 0.15% commission rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 21:34:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2234 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472383</link>
      <description>Commission income from alleged accommodation entries was estimated at 0.15% of the entry amounts. Consistent estimates at that rate in the taxpayer&#039;s immediately succeeding assessment years were applied under the principle of judicial discipline, rather than the proposed 1% rate. The income was therefore assessed using the 0.15% commission rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>