<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1490 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472395</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail in serious economic-offence investigations is exceptional and depends on the gravity of allegations, each accused&#039;s individual role, public interest, and the need for effective custodial interrogation. The alleged primary decision-maker, attributed overall control of the companies, acceptance of clandestine clearances, and responsibility for GST liability, was considered unsuitable for pre-arrest protection while the investigation continued. An ancillary field-level participant acting under that person&#039;s directions was treated differently because of the limited role and qualified for protection. Pre-arrest protection therefore turns on individual culpability and investigative necessity rather than identical treatment of all accused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 21:34:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1490 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472395</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail in serious economic-offence investigations is exceptional and depends on the gravity of allegations, each accused&#039;s individual role, public interest, and the need for effective custodial interrogation. The alleged primary decision-maker, attributed overall control of the companies, acceptance of clandestine clearances, and responsibility for GST liability, was considered unsuitable for pre-arrest protection while the investigation continued. An ancillary field-level participant acting under that person&#039;s directions was treated differently because of the limited role and qualified for protection. Pre-arrest protection therefore turns on individual culpability and investigative necessity rather than identical treatment of all accused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>