<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 214 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54412</link>
    <description>Marginal shortage in inputs received at the factory, caused by transit or handling loss and differences in weighment at different weigh-bridges, did not justify denial of credit. The shortage was only 0.01%, and the variation was treated as within permissible limits of fluctuation, including differences attributable to calibration or weighment at separate weigh-bridges. On that basis, the reasoning of the Commissioner (Appeals) was accepted and the order allowing credit was sustained, with the Revenue&#039;s challenge failing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:49:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 214 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54412</link>
      <description>Marginal shortage in inputs received at the factory, caused by transit or handling loss and differences in weighment at different weigh-bridges, did not justify denial of credit. The shortage was only 0.01%, and the variation was treated as within permissible limits of fluctuation, including differences attributable to calibration or weighment at separate weigh-bridges. On that basis, the reasoning of the Commissioner (Appeals) was accepted and the order allowing credit was sustained, with the Revenue&#039;s challenge failing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>