<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Builder-financing additions fail without proof of unexplained source, while disputed stamp values require DVO-based reassessment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104730</link>
    <description>Builder-financing additions for alleged cash receipts or payments cannot be sustained as unexplained money or unexplained investment where the amount represents return of an accounted banking-channel advance and no independent unexplained source or accretion is established. Alleged interest income cannot be inferred solely from a purported financing arrangement where property acquisitions were explained as investments generating rental income and capital gains. Stamp-duty valuation provisions apply to immovable-property acquisitions irrespective of their characterisation as builder financing. Where the stamp-duty value of under-construction property is disputed, fair market value must be determined through the statutory valuation mechanism before taxability and quantum are decided; the valuation issues require DVO-based fresh determination after hearing the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 11:10:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 11:10:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Builder-financing additions fail without proof of unexplained source, while disputed stamp values require DVO-based reassessment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104730</link>
      <description>Builder-financing additions for alleged cash receipts or payments cannot be sustained as unexplained money or unexplained investment where the amount represents return of an accounted banking-channel advance and no independent unexplained source or accretion is established. Alleged interest income cannot be inferred solely from a purported financing arrangement where property acquisitions were explained as investments generating rental income and capital gains. Stamp-duty valuation provisions apply to immovable-property acquisitions irrespective of their characterisation as builder financing. Where the stamp-duty value of under-construction property is disputed, fair market value must be determined through the statutory valuation mechanism before taxability and quantum are decided; the valuation issues require DVO-based fresh determination after hearing the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 11:10:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>