<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bankruptcy estate vesting makes post-commencement bank withdrawals unauthorised, while jewellery sale proceeds remain available to creditors.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104713</link>
    <description>From the commencement of personal bankruptcy, money standing to the bankrupt&#039;s credit in a bank account constitutes property vested by law in the Bankruptcy Trustee. Post-commencement withdrawals are therefore unauthorised dealings and must be returned, irrespective of claimed lack of knowledge where prior notice and creditor-meeting participation exist. Statutory exclusion for unencumbered personal ornaments is limited by prescribed conditions and a value cap; it does not extend to sale proceeds deposited in a bank account, particularly where the claimed proceeds exceed that cap. Recall of an ex parte return order requires demonstrated prejudice, which was not established. Both appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:46:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:46:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Bankruptcy estate vesting makes post-commencement bank withdrawals unauthorised, while jewellery sale proceeds remain available to creditors.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104713</link>
      <description>From the commencement of personal bankruptcy, money standing to the bankrupt&#039;s credit in a bank account constitutes property vested by law in the Bankruptcy Trustee. Post-commencement withdrawals are therefore unauthorised dealings and must be returned, irrespective of claimed lack of knowledge where prior notice and creditor-meeting participation exist. Statutory exclusion for unencumbered personal ornaments is limited by prescribed conditions and a value cap; it does not extend to sale proceeds deposited in a bank account, particularly where the claimed proceeds exceed that cap. Recall of an ex parte return order requires demonstrated prejudice, which was not established. Both appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:46:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>