<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 408 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54403</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Commissioner to pass a speaking order after ensuring natural justice to provide an appropriate appellate remedy to the Appellant. The rejection letter by the Additional Commissioner was deemed not an appellable order, emphasizing the importance of natural justice. The appeal against the rejection of the duty remission claim was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:17:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 408 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54403</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Commissioner to pass a speaking order after ensuring natural justice to provide an appropriate appellate remedy to the Appellant. The rejection letter by the Additional Commissioner was deemed not an appellable order, emphasizing the importance of natural justice. The appeal against the rejection of the duty remission claim was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>