<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 627 - GSTAT BENGALURU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800684</link>
    <description>For 2017-18, supplier credit notes did not themselves require recipients to reverse input tax credit: the statutory framework then governed reduction of the supplier&#039;s output liability, the matching mechanism was not operational, and Rule 37 applied only to non-payment of suppliers within 180 days. Past-period GSTR-3B errors could be corrected on a net basis. Excess IGST should ordinarily be refunded or adjusted against future IGST liability; a refund paid through the electronic credit ledger would be recredited as IGST input tax credit, then cross-utilisable against CGST and SGST. Direct cross-head adjustment bypassed that route but was a bona fide, revenue-neutral procedural lapse that did not support tax, interest, or penalty recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 11:43:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 627 - GSTAT BENGALURU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800684</link>
      <description>For 2017-18, supplier credit notes did not themselves require recipients to reverse input tax credit: the statutory framework then governed reduction of the supplier&#039;s output liability, the matching mechanism was not operational, and Rule 37 applied only to non-payment of suppliers within 180 days. Past-period GSTR-3B errors could be corrected on a net basis. Excess IGST should ordinarily be refunded or adjusted against future IGST liability; a refund paid through the electronic credit ledger would be recredited as IGST input tax credit, then cross-utilisable against CGST and SGST. Direct cross-head adjustment bypassed that route but was a bona fide, revenue-neutral procedural lapse that did not support tax, interest, or penalty recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>