<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 632 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800689</link>
    <description>Statutory appellate remedy was permitted despite expiry of the prescribed limitation period and the period capable of condonation. The petitioner received liberty to file an appeal within two weeks. The appeal was to be entertained without any objection based on limitation, enabling recourse to the statutory appellate process notwithstanding the expired time limits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 09:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 632 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800689</link>
      <description>Statutory appellate remedy was permitted despite expiry of the prescribed limitation period and the period capable of condonation. The petitioner received liberty to file an appeal within two weeks. The appeal was to be entertained without any objection based on limitation, enabling recourse to the statutory appellate process notwithstanding the expired time limits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>