<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1672 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472357</link>
    <description>Interest-free advances to wholly owned subsidiaries, used for overseas business expansion as owners&#039; quasi-equity and not funded by domestic borrowings, were not benchmarked as ordinary loans for a notional-interest transfer-pricing adjustment; the adjustment was deleted. Corporate-guarantee pricing was restricted to 0.5%, reflecting an arm&#039;s-length rate materially lower than a bank-guarantee rate. A creditor&#039;s write-off supported an addition for remission or cessation of the related trading liability, while a separate alleged liability required verification of whether it remained outstanding in the taxpayer&#039;s books. Only the established write-off addition survived, subject to verification of the other liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 20:44:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1672 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472357</link>
      <description>Interest-free advances to wholly owned subsidiaries, used for overseas business expansion as owners&#039; quasi-equity and not funded by domestic borrowings, were not benchmarked as ordinary loans for a notional-interest transfer-pricing adjustment; the adjustment was deleted. Corporate-guarantee pricing was restricted to 0.5%, reflecting an arm&#039;s-length rate materially lower than a bank-guarantee rate. A creditor&#039;s write-off supported an addition for remission or cessation of the related trading liability, while a separate alleged liability required verification of whether it remained outstanding in the taxpayer&#039;s books. Only the established write-off addition survived, subject to verification of the other liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>