<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 354 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54396</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a stay on the Commissioner (Appeals) order confiscating imported goods found in possession of passengers arriving from Chennai to Mumbai. The Tribunal considered the lack of fixed addresses for the respondents and the potential hindrance in tracing the goods if released, leading to the decision to stay the operation of the order during the appeal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:08:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 354 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54396</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a stay on the Commissioner (Appeals) order confiscating imported goods found in possession of passengers arriving from Chennai to Mumbai. The Tribunal considered the lack of fixed addresses for the respondents and the potential hindrance in tracing the goods if released, leading to the decision to stay the operation of the order during the appeal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>