<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 298 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54388</link>
    <description>Metal scrap arising from dismantling and scrapping imported old machinery, without any manufacturing process or mechanical working of iron or steel, was held not liable to central excise duty. As the scrap was not treated as dutyable excisable goods generated through manufacture, the duty demand was unsustainable. Once the demand failed, no penalty could be imposed. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:58:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 298 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54388</link>
      <description>Metal scrap arising from dismantling and scrapping imported old machinery, without any manufacturing process or mechanical working of iron or steel, was held not liable to central excise duty. As the scrap was not treated as dutyable excisable goods generated through manufacture, the duty demand was unsustainable. Once the demand failed, no penalty could be imposed. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>